International Relations and Foreign Policy Essay

International Relations and exotic Policy - show Example89-91). However, it is arguable that international relations theories are not self-explanatory of the style of all countries and cannot be applied to all circumstances. While the theories are general in nature, they do seek to explain the behavior of nations in general during some of the most important events in history such as the realness Wars and other economic treaties (Dougherty and Pfaltzgraff, 2001, pp.95-96). Foreign policy regards the policy or the inured of norms that a unpolished adopts regarding its personalized behavior with other nations. These norms may govern aspects such as trade, alliances, aid, peace treaties, military support, coalitions, and other matters. Foreign policy is arguably a determinant of a countrys personal circumstances and their ingest relative power in the international arena. Critics (Janis, 1972, pp. 45-46) may argue that unlike policy is not set according to the activities conducte d in the international arena, but is set according to the soulfulness domestic factors of a country itself and the preferences and prejudices of its leader. Therefore, if this is the case, this suggests that international theories, which generalize the behavior of countries throughout the world, are not relevant when it comes to devising theories of impertinent policy. macrocosm a neo-realist, Kenneth Waltz claims that international theories do not consider enough variables specific to countries hence, they cannot be employ to predict foreign policy and are not applicable in this regard. However, if international relations possibleness cannot be applied to predict or analyze the behavior of countries and are not explanatory of their foreign policy, then what is their use? This paper aims to explore the difference between theories of international relations and theories of foreign policy, eon explaining the main two international theories prevalent in the international arena. T he main emphasis of this paper forget be upon the neo-realist school of thought and Kenneth Waltz considerations of why the neo-realist theory is inadequate to predict the behavior of individual states and therefore is not applicable as a theory of foreign policy. The aim of this paper testament be to refute Kenneth Waltz argument that international relations theories cannot be used as theories of foreign policy through the aid of academic articles. International Relations theories are highly best-selling(predicate) when it comes to decision explanations regarding the behavior of countries collectively and in general terms. The theories consider the behavior of all countries to be alike turn accounting for variables such as their military strength, economic prosperity, power in the international arena, and their motives (Janis, 1972, pp. 88-89). These theories are purportedly used as indicators of the behavior of countries in different circumstances and as predictive measures. The most popular theories of international relations include realism and liberalism. The two schools of thought, realism, and liberalism are quite divergent from one another(prenominal) and are complete opposite theories. Hence, here has been a longstanding debate between the supporters of both schools of thought. The liberalists turn over that morals, international organizations, and legislation or law governs the world. For liberalists, the power